![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The search volume for Endnote continuously decreases. All other top-ranked tools rather gain popularity, although it seems that Zotero and Mendeley are “saturated”, according to search volume (of course, when the search volume remains constantly high, the tools still gain a remarkable number of new users every month). A little bit surprising is the high variation in the search volume for Noodletools and also RefWorks. The search volume for Citavi slowly, but constantly, increased over the past years. In contrast, JabRef, Referencer, and CiteULike quite significantly lost popularity. This chart shows data only from 2007 on because Google Trends simply did not export the other data (a bug?). In addition, you should ignore the very last bit of the chart – the search volume for Qiqqa certainly did not drop to zero, but Google Trends usually provides unreliable data for the current month. The above picture shows even clearer how the interest in CiteULike decreases. While CiteULike once was far more popular than Docear, search volume for CiteULike and Docear is nowadays about the same. Bibsonomy and Colwiz have a comparable search volume (about half of Docear or CiteULike). However, for Colwiz the search volume remains constant over the years while for Bibsonomy it is decreasing. It seems that around 2005, Biblioscape was quite popular but nowadays it’s hardly searched for any more. The search volume for Connotea is also constantly decreasing since its launch in 2005. #Readcube papers export reference list software. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |